MIT vs Wharton: Is AI a Success or Failure? (Reality Check)

📚 Join the #1 community for AI entrepreneurs and connect with 260k+ members: https://bit.ly/3JTNodE
📈 We help entrepreneurs, industry experts & developers build and scale their AI Agency: https://bit.ly/3WSykA5
🤝 Ready to transform your business with AI? Let’s talk: https://bit.ly/4qVr97X

🎙️ Have a story worth telling? Be a guest on my podcast: https://bit.ly/yt-podcast-application

More AI Business Content ⤵️
→ My Vlog/BTS Channel: https://bit.ly/LiamOttleyVlogs
→ Instagram: / liamottley
→ X: https://x.com/liamottley_

🚀 Apply to Join My Team: https://bit.ly/explore-roles

MIT says 95% of AI projects are failing.

Wharton says 75% of companies are seeing positive ROI.

So… who’s actually right?

In this video, I break down both reports to reveal why their results seem to contradict, what’s really happening behind the numbers, and how you can use these insights to plan your AI business strategy for 2026.

You’ll learn:
• Why MIT’s 95% failure rate doesn’t mean AI is doomed
• What Wharton discovered about teams using ChatGPT, Copilot & Claude
• The 3 plays AI agency owners should make in 2026.

⏱️ Timestamps:
00:00 What We’re Covering
00:52 Why MIT says 95% fail vs Wharton’s 75% ROI
04:39 Play 1: Training-based offers for fast, low-risk ROI
05:52 Play 2: Talent, upskilling, and AI recruiting
07:22 Play 3: Custom development—how agencies double success odds
08:52 Strategies and Tips for AI Agency Owners
12:18 Final Thoughts

With developments in AI moving so fast, I’m constantly working on my own projects and those of clients and sharing my learnings with my viewers 2-3x per week.